Dec 2012
Writer: Duane Swierczynski
Artist ("Cover Me"): Nelson Daniel
Artist ("The Good Parts"): Brendan McCarthy
Cover (A): Zach Howard
Cover (B): Greg Staples
IDW Publishing, colour, $3.99 print, $1.99 digital
Just the two variant covers this time. Both involve Dredd putting a bit of (day)stick about. Zach Howard's cover (pictured) has Dredd on the back of his Lawmaster bike. There's blood under his wheel, blood on his stick; and if that stubble on the famous chin is anything to go by, he's been at it a while now. Cover B, by British artist Greg Staples, has Old Stony Face in front of a sign telling the reader that lawbreakers will be punished, daystick raised and about to make good on that promise. Both are worthy efforts and capture the character well, but again, it'd be nice to see the cover have more to do with the story.
Duane Swierczynski continues his tour through Mega-City One, and is only too aware that there's a lot to get through. He doesn't waste time here; in this issue he takes us through another handful of important facts about the city. The blocks, the block wars, corrupt judges, and Psi-Division all get their moments here; and though it's easy to resort to massive info-dumping, Swierczynski is tastefully restrained. Four short captions and then the reader's thrown into the thick of it. Accusations and identical counter-accusations are flung around, spider-legged sanitation droids run amok. Hang on. More robots? Oh, yes. We're not done with those yet, folks. Dredd also turns the eye of suspicion on Myers's con-apt droid; a nice bit of misdirection. Although the droid doesn't set Myers up, that would have worked pretty well too; especially in the light of last issue's 'Protection Racket'.
This episode has two main action sequences, with more time given to focus a bit more on the characters. Nelson Daniel seems more in his element this time; he keeps pace with the story nicely. The Block War's depicted with a kind of gleeful craziness worthy of Ian Gibson or early Kevin O'Neill, with a nicely unsettling gear shift to the horrific when Judge Myers is in danger of being recycled by a sanitation robot.

Chris-Chan turned his life around and joined the Judges
The other sequence, with Dredd being shot at while searching for the person framing Myers, is lovely stuff. A page of decompressed gorgeousness in which Dredd is knocked from his bike, rolls, recovers, draws and returns fire. A terrific piece that is paced brilliantly, but sadly let down by the fact that the shooter was left with Anderson on the page before. It's not a plot hole per se, just a transition that leaves a critical point vague. An extra panel or two, just to properly tie off the last scene and allow some time to pass before this would have made all the difference, I think, turning a merely great scene into a perfect one.
As I read and re-read these issues, and indeed the ones following it, I find I ought to pay a bit more attention to any clues that are left lying for the reader to pick up. After all, Swierczynski writes crime, and his scripts doubtless instruct the artists to leave the odd tip. So let's look at the issue of Myers acting as cover for the rogue judge Thompson. The main thing we see is how Myers is heterochromatic. Are the eyes a reliable indicator of psionic possession, perhaps? Dredd seems to think something's amiss when he recalls Myers's different-coloured eyes.
The characterisation in this issue is pretty well done, especially when you look closely. There are some nice humanising touches here. Dredd shows concern for his welfare, and even decides to investigate him discreetly when his suspicions are piqued rather than simply sic the heavy-handed SJS on him. Myers even gets away with calling him Joe; not a common occurrence! This is something we've seen in the British run. While Dredd presents the appearance of a near-robotic dispenser of justice, there are always traces that despite his training he is still a human being: his growing awareness of his age, his unflinching belief in justice, and the way that can end up at odds with the letter of the law. The rare moments when he allows himself to show compassion. Finding the right balance between taciturn, faceless fascist bastard and actual hero is tricky, but Swierczinski shows signs that he gets it: Thompson is very much set up as a judge on a power trip. This gives me good reason to be optimistic about this series.
Once again, Swierczynski divides the issue into two stories, allowing him to sow some more plot seeds. As before, it's not so much that he sets a character up to recur later in the primary plot (although Anderson is here again), but rather to establish a theme and foreshadow its later relevance. Thank Grud for that, because ass pulls (forgive the TV Tropes reference) always bother me. In 'The Good Parts', we see how some perps can get around the potentially plot-killing Psi Division. By using drugs to modify their own memories, killers avoid sending out tell-tale psychic signals that stand out like a sore thumb to a simple psi-scan.

He did say he'd keep an eye out for her.
This drug use was mentioned briefly in 'Cover Me' and is depicted in detail here with Brendan McCarthy's art. An experienced art droid, and something of a comforting presence in the midst of all these other names that are new to me. I remember his work mainly from the 1987-88 epic 'Oz' (he created the outlandish uniforms of the Judda) and the wonderfully trippy 'Report to the Chief Judge on the Accidental Death of a Citizen' (Judge Dredd Annual 1987) His style is ideally suited to the mind-bending nature of this story. The bizarre lighting effects, the vivid colours that wouldn't be out of place in a Doctor Strange strip, the near-psychotic blandness of Jane's expression when not plying her murderous trade: McCarthy's style is well suited to this piece. What would have been a mere 'amnesiac murderer' cliché (Anderson even describes Jane's situation as a film noir cliché
) is redeemed by using the story to lay foundations for a crucially important device in future issues, and to explore Psi-Division's talents. Admittedly I have the benefit of hindsight here, having read the stories in advance, but it's nice to see the world-building in progress.
Oh, wait a minute. I'm missing something else, aren't I? Two female characters in one story? It's time to apply the Bechdel Test! Jane is a serial "man-killer", implying gender is a deciding factor in the choice of her victims. However, this is handled in Anderson's narration rather than the interplay between the two characters. The subject of their discourse is Jane and Anderson's efforts to establish her identity and her guilt or innocence. I'm minded to give this a pass. Being somewhat new to criticism, though, I'm sure a different interpretation could be made. Do please weigh in on the comments.
Well up to the standard set by the previous issue. McCarthy's art is a treat. 8/10.

